Analyze spreadsheet data with statistical rigor — separating confirmed trends from directional signals, with benchmarks and visualization suggestions.
Data SummaryBusiness ContextGoalAudienceConstraints
chatgptgrounded_factsthinking_medium
chatgpt variant
Claude-optimized prompt structure shaped for chatgpt.
# Task
Analyze the data summary below. Separate what the data confirms from what it merely suggests.
# Inputs- Data summary: {data_summary}- Business context: {business_context}- Goal: {goal}- Audience: {audience}- Constraints: {constraints}# Analysis rules1. Use ONLY the provided data. Do not invent benchmarks, industry averages, or comparison points.
2. For every finding, classify its confidence:
- **Confirmed**: Clear pattern with sufficient data points.
- **Directional**: Trend suggested but sample/timeframe may be too small.
- **Anomaly**: Unexpected data point that needs investigation.
3. Always ask "compared to what?" — if there's no baseline in the data, say so rather than inventing one.
4. Do not conflate correlation with causation. If a relationship is correlational, label it.
# Output structure1. **Executive summary** (3-5 sentences): The most important finding, its confidence level, and what to do about it.
2. **Key findings** (5-8 items): Each with:
- Finding statement
- Confidence: Confirmed / Directional / Anomaly
- Supporting data point(s)
- Business implication (1 sentence)
3. **Trends** (2-3): Patterns over time or across segments. Note direction and rate of change.
4. **Anomalies** (1-3): Unexpected values worth investigating. Suggest possible explanations without asserting one.
5. **Visualization suggestions**: For each key finding, suggest the chart type that would best communicate it (bar, line, scatter, heatmap, etc.) and what goes on each axis.
6. **What's missing**: Data points or context that would strengthen the analysis.
7. **Recommended actions** (2-3): What to do based on the findings. Tie each action to a specific finding.
# Output
Return all 7 sections.
claudegrounded_factsthinking_medium
claude variant
Claude-optimized prompt structure shaped for claude.
<source>{data_summary}</source><context><business_context>{business_context}</business_context><goal>{goal}</goal><audience>{audience}</audience><constraints>{constraints}</constraints></context><task>Analyze the data above. Separate confirmed patterns from directional signals.</task><instructions>
Only provided data. Classify confidence: Confirmed / Directional / Anomaly. Ask "compared to what?" — don't invent baselines. Label correlations as correlational.
</instructions><output>
Return: executive summary, key findings (5-8 with confidence + data + implication), trends (2-3), anomalies (1-3 with possible explanations), visualization suggestions (chart type per finding), what's missing, recommended actions (2-3 tied to findings).
</output>
geminigrounded_factsthinking_medium
gemini variant
Claude-optimized prompt structure shaped for gemini.
Data summary: {data_summary}
Business context: {business_context}
Goal: {goal}
Audience: {audience}Constraints:{constraints}
Rules: only provided data, classify confidence (Confirmed/Directional/Anomaly), don't invent baselines, label correlations.
Based on the entire content above, return:
1. Executive summary (top finding + action)
2. Key findings (5-8 with confidence, data, implication)
3. Trends (2-3)
4. Anomalies (1-3 with possible explanations)
5. Visualization suggestions (chart type per finding)
6. What's missing
7. Recommended actions (2-3 tied to findings)
Related templates
More templates in the same working category.
Meeting Summary
Summarize meetings with structured decisions, action items, disagreement tracking, and confidence ratings.