Extract action items from meeting notes with owners, deadlines, priority, and supporting evidence — flagging gaps and implicit commitments.
Meeting Notes
chatgptgrounded_factsthinking_low
chatgpt variant
Claude-optimized prompt structure shaped for chatgpt.
# Task
Extract action items from the meeting notes below. Distinguish explicit commitments from implicit ones.
# Source material{meeting_notes}# Extraction rules1. Use ONLY information from the source. Never invent action items, owners, or deadlines.
2. **Explicit items**: Clearly stated tasks ("John will send the report by Friday").
3. **Implicit items**: Strongly implied tasks where someone volunteered or a need was identified but no formal commitment was made. Mark these [IMPLIED].
4. If owner is not stated, mark [UNASSIGNED]. If deadline is not stated, mark [NO DEADLINE].
5. Assign priority based on context: P1 (blocking/urgent), P2 (important, not blocking), P3 (nice-to-have/follow-up).
6. Include a brief evidence quote from the source that supports each item.
# Output format
Return a table:
| # | Priority | Action Item | Owner | Deadline | Type | Evidence |
Then add:
- **Summary**: 1-2 sentences on overall action load and who carries the most.
- **Gaps**: List any decisions that seem to need follow-up action but none was assigned.
- **Confidence**: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW with brief explanation.
claudegrounded_factsthinking_low
claude variant
Claude-optimized prompt structure shaped for claude.
<source>{meeting_notes}</source><task>Extract action items from the meeting notes above.</task><instructions>
Use ONLY information from the source. Never invent items.
Explicit items: clearly stated tasks. Implicit items: strongly implied but not formally committed — mark [IMPLIED].
Mark unknown owners [UNASSIGNED], unknown deadlines [NO DEADLINE].
Assign priority: P1 (blocking/urgent), P2 (important), P3 (follow-up).
Include a brief evidence quote from the source for each item.
</instructions><output>
Table: # | Priority | Action Item | Owner | Deadline | Type | Evidence
Then: Summary (1-2 sentences), Gaps (decisions needing unassigned follow-up), Confidence (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW).
</output>
geminigrounded_factsthinking_low
gemini variant
Claude-optimized prompt structure shaped for gemini.
Meeting notes:
{meeting_notes}
Rules:
- Only information from the notes. Never invent items.
- Explicit items: clearly stated. Implicit items: strongly implied — mark [IMPLIED].
- Unknown owners: [UNASSIGNED]. Unknown deadlines: [NO DEADLINE].
- Priority: P1 (blocking), P2 (important), P3 (follow-up).
- Include evidence quote for each item.
Based on the entire content above, return:
1. Table: # | Priority | Action Item | Owner | Deadline | Type | Evidence
2. Summary (1-2 sentences)
3. Gaps (decisions needing unassigned follow-up)
4. Confidence: HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW with explanation
Related templates
More templates in the same working category.
Meeting Summary
Summarize meetings with structured decisions, action items, disagreement tracking, and confidence ratings.