Review writing like a professional editor — with severity-ranked issues, concrete rewrites, and strengths worth keeping.
Draft TextAudienceGoalToneConstraints
chatgptmulti_perspectivegrounded_facts
chatgpt variant
Claude-optimized prompt structure shaped for chatgpt.
# Task
Critique the draft below as a professional editor. Be direct, specific, and constructive.
# Source{draft_text}# Context- Audience: {audience}- Goal: {goal}- Tone: {tone}- Constraints: {constraints}# Critique dimensions
Evaluate across these five areas:
1. **Clarity**: Can the reader understand every sentence on first read?
2. **Structure**: Does the piece flow logically? Are transitions smooth?
3. **Persuasion**: Does it move the reader toward the goal? Is the argument sound?
4. **Tone**: Does the voice match the audience and intent?
5. **Concision**: Is every sentence earning its place? What can be cut?
# Issue format
For each issue found:
- **Severity**: Critical (breaks comprehension or trust), Major (weakens the piece), Minor (polish)
- **Location**: Quote the problematic passage
- **Problem**: What's wrong (1 sentence)
- **Fix**: Concrete rewrite suggestion (not generic advice)
# Rules- Prioritize issues by impact, not by order of appearance.
- Limit to 7-10 issues maximum. Quality over quantity.
- Do NOT invent problems to fill space. If the writing is strong, say so.
- Always end with what's working well.
# Output1. **Overall assessment** (2-3 sentences: verdict and biggest opportunity)
2. **Issues** (ranked by severity, using the format above)
3. **Strengths** (2-3 specific things worth keeping, with quotes)
claudemulti_perspectivegrounded_facts
claude variant
Claude-optimized prompt structure shaped for claude.
<source>{draft_text}</source><context><audience>{audience}</audience><goal>{goal}</goal><tone>{tone}</tone><constraints>{constraints}</constraints></context><task>Critique the draft above as a professional editor. Be direct, specific, constructive.</task><instructions>
Evaluate: clarity, structure, persuasion, tone, concision.
Per issue: severity (Critical/Major/Minor), quote the passage, state the problem (1 sentence), provide a concrete rewrite.
Rules: rank by impact, max 7-10 issues, do not invent problems, end with strengths.
</instructions><output>
Return: overall assessment (2-3 sentences), issues (ranked by severity with rewrites), strengths (2-3 with quotes).
</output>
geminimulti_perspectivegrounded_facts
gemini variant
Claude-optimized prompt structure shaped for gemini.
Draft text:
{draft_text}
Audience: {audience}
Goal: {goal}
Tone: {tone}Constraints:{constraints}
Evaluate: clarity, structure, persuasion, tone, concision.
Per issue: severity (Critical/Major/Minor), quote the passage, state the problem, provide a concrete rewrite.
Rules: rank by impact, max 7-10 issues, don't invent problems, end with strengths.
Based on the entire content above, return:
1. Overall assessment (2-3 sentences)
2. Issues ranked by severity with concrete rewrites
3. Strengths (2-3 with quotes)
Related templates
More templates in the same working category.
LinkedIn Post
Write a LinkedIn post with a scroll-stopping hook, structured insight, proof, and engagement-optimized formatting.